I think that you are trying to divert people's attention from a number of important issues.
Its not all about your candidate, or about race. Why can't you Obama supporters ever address the very real issues that are being discussed here and instead, try to focus on minutiae.
The reality is not that complicated to understand if you would just LISTEN.
ITS NOT ALL ABOUT HIM OR YOU
You are trying to pretend that your candidate exists in a vacuum. He doesn't and America has a LOT of BIG problems of which racism is ONE.
Its an important one, granted, BUT I am NOT convinced that voting for Obama would do ANYTHING to solve it. In fact, I know that Obama has policies in his platform that will profoundly hurt many poor black people as much as they will hurt poor other people.
ALSO, at this point, I think that Obama's callos lack of understanding of poor people's issues and victim stance would make racism WORSE in both the long and short runs.
You selfish IDIOTS should consider that, but of course you don't and wont.
Hey, that's not humorous. And you really shouldn't insult people like that.
...notches.
Note the tip jar, which said comedy only.
Based on the media, APPARENLY, the only people who still have an issue with race are... BLACK PEOPLE.
But keep screaming in the bold type, which makes you seem so much more right.
here is what i learned:
- the right wing talking points from the 90's can be be recycled and used by a dem on another dem
a better place if men were measured by arugula (or any leafy green for that matter)rather than "god" and gold.
...........my $0.02
Fox is fair and balanced, but the New York Times is hopelessly biased.
I learned that a whole campaign of "hope" and "change" can be built on: resentment, tribalism, claims of entitlement yet victimhood, ignorance of history, convenient revisionism, disparagement and disavowing of American duties and responsibilities in the world at large.
A little more seriously: The Obama campaign is principally about the Party and groups ascendent within it.
The Clinton campaign is about dealing with the big picture mess we're in as a country.
The Obama campaign claims to be competent in the area the Clinton focus is on, but hasn't convinced. The Clinton campaign doesn't claim to be about the long term future of the Party.
Both campaigns are about doing things that are overdue. But one will be better at the combination of both tasks. My bet is on Clinton.
1.Keith Olberman is a pathetic hack who cant' adhere to basic standards of journalism'
What I haven't been able to figure out: Why someone as disatrous as Donna Brazile is taken so seriously given her association with such fiascos as the 88 Dukakis Campaign